On Sale This Week: Pork Sausages + Poultry Broths

Agriculture and Climate Change: A Farmer's Perspective

written by

Mike Dougherty

posted on

June 4, 2023

The discussion around agriculture and climate change has been ramping up over the past few years. While there have been pressures on agriculture to change and reduce "emissions" leading up to this phase, there is an increasing tension with more and more calls to make drastic changes. To get a sense of the rhetoric around the issue, take a listen to John Kerry's speech at The Agriculture Innovation Mission for Climate (AIM for Climate) Summit.  It starts at around the 21 minutes mark and is about 22 minutes long.

For a few examples of where this type of rhetoric can go, take a look at the Netherlands, where farmers are being offered 120% of their farms value to sell. Sounds pretty good, but the catch is that if they don't accept, they will be forced to sell in addition they aren't "allowed" to start up farms anywhere in the EU. There is also a push in Ireland to cull huge numbers of cows to achieve climate targets.

Kerry laments that agriculture causes about 33% of the worlds "emissions", but according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change agriculture generates 10% to 12% of greenhouse gas emissions globally, with packaging, transportation, and waste management generating the remainder.

"We can't get to net-zero, we don't get this job done unless agriculture is front and center as part of the solution. So all of us understand here the depths of this mission." ... "lives depend on world leaders and scientists developing the tools necessary to lower agriculture emissions.... I refuse to call it climate change anymore. It's not change. It's a crisis."

He discusses how many deaths are currently caused by a changing climate and how many are estimated in the future if we don't do something. It really pulls at your heart strings. Hopefully Mr. Kerry is also giving speeches at military conferences discussing how many lives could be saved and how much carbon wouldn't be emitted by curbing military involvement or arms sales in however many countries they currently operate in/sell to.

I'm not necessarily against progress or technology in agriculture, but I am certainly pessimistic. I think it is inevitable and could be a powerful way to produce more food in ways that will hopefully have less impact on our environment and more of a positive impact on the people it feeds. When I say that, I don't mean simply it will emit less carbon, I mean from a holistic standpoint, if new technology can use fewer chemicals, focus on soil health and produce food that nourishes (and not simply feeds), then that is great. 

That said, I think without a nuanced approach towards agriculture, one that is not solely dependent on technology, focuses exclusively on "emissions" and calories produced, our food systems (which will corelate to our health) will eventually go the way of many other professions and industries - a heavily regulated monolith with ever increasing farm sizes, profit driven policies and little opportunity for young people or choice for the consumer.

The solutions that many people talk about regarding innovation in the food sector are technology based. They will require huge investment and capital, which will inevitably lead to fewer and fewer people responsible for food production and greater control by those who control the money.

The interesting thing, and in my opinion a huge flaw in their argument (and tell that they aren't sincere in their concern), is that the cow (a truly amazing beast) is a target. Because cows produce methane, the conclusion of the "scientists" and spreadsheet gurus is that we must reduce the number of cows. Pretty cut and dry, except like most things there is nuance. A great explanation on how the methane cows "emit" is actually part of a natural cycle can be found here and the movie Sacred Cow is a great watch regarding our food systems and the benefit that cows and other ruminants can have to our health and environment.

Another thing to consider is that while many agricultural systems and new "food" technologies like fake meat are scalable and can be technology driven, the cow isn't that simple. Even if those cows end up in a feedlot that can be mechanized and seem like an assembly line, they were born on a farm somewhere, nursing on their mother and eating grass for several months. They haven't figured out how simulate this at scale or cost effectively and I don't think they can. There are some things that technology and human ingenuity can't do (I hope). They can create factories where pork or chicken come out the back end, but they can't do it with beef.

In my opinion, if they actually wanted to remove carbon from the atmosphere effectively, they would engage with regenerative farmers, agroforestry experts and ecologist on how to work with nature, sequester carbon in the soils and trees and produce high quality food. This could employ millions of people, improve the environment (in countless ways far beyond removing carbon from the atmosphere), produce superior food (and therefore a healthier population) and change the trajectory of our society. This would build resiliency into our systems as well, rather than simply (and arrogantly) trying to prevent changes to our climate.

Instead they look for solutions in the same place they found the problem. More technology, more control and more shaming of anyone who speaks up or asks questions.

The solution is in your back yard, in your neighborhood and in your community.

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience" C.S. Lewis

More from the blog

Cloned Meat? Never on Our Farm

Over the past week, I've received quite a few messages about Health Canada's recent announcement. They have deemed cloned meat, specifically beef and pork, as safe. This means there will be no labels identifying it as cloned and no warnings to consumers. You can read more from Health Canada here and see what Sylvain Charlebois, a food professor, has to say in a story by the Epoch Times here. How Cloned Animals Will Be Used Cloned animals will likely serve as breeding stock, not directly for your dinner table. Animals with desirable traits-such as fast growth, disease resistance, or high milk production-can be cloned. Their offspring, with those traits, will go on to produce milk and meat efficiently. However, those cloned breeding animals will eventually enter the food chain. Selecting for desirable traits has been part of farming for generations. Farmers often keep heifer calves that grow well, are docile, and have good lineage, while letting go of those that don't meet these criteria. My Reaction and Reflections Like many of you, my initial reaction was one of disgust. After looking into it more, my feelings shifted to disappointment and reflection. This situation raises questions about what we want from our food and agricultural systems versus what is actually happening. I want to be clear - I don’t like it and want no part of it. But it is not surprising. It’s one more step toward a highly efficient, bland, and centralized food system. In such a system, the food people truly want becomes less affordable, while mass-produced options are deemed “safe” by authorities. The Push for Efficiency and Sustainability Cloned animals may also be marketed as "sustainable". Perhaps they can produce less methane, or cows can produce more milk, meaning fewer animals are needed. Pigs could be cloned to grow faster. While this sounds efficient, it risks consolidation, huge farms, and fewer people on the land. Transparency is limited. The government has not widely communicated these changes, which is concerning. As Sylvain Charlebois notes: Health Canada argues that cloned animals and their offspring are indistinguishable from conventional ones, so they should be treated the same. The problem isn’t the science-it’s the silence. Canadians are not being told that the rules for a controversial technology are about to change. No press release, no public statement, just a quiet update on a government website most citizens will never read. Know Your Farmer, Know Your Food We must consider more than efficiency. Food represents health, connection, and community. Major changes to production systems deserve careful thought. While efficiency can help feed people, food is about more than just sustenance. I encourage everyone to connect with the people who grow or produce your food. It might cost a little more, but the quality is often higher. You can ask questions, learn where your food comes from, and support systems outside mass production. Thanks for following along, and we hope you have a great day!

Reuniting the Herd and Preparing for Winter in Ontario

Bringing the Herd Back Together This year, we had two groups of cows, one at our farm and another at a rental farm. This past week, the group that spent the grazing season at the rental farm finally came home. Bringing everyone back together always creates a bit of commotion as the pecking orders need to be re-established. For the first half-hour or so, the boss cows made sure everyone knew their place. Some of the calves joined in too, though they seemed more interested in playing around than asserting dominance. The main event was the bulls testing each other for supremacy. Bulls Establishing Dominance Adam, our big black bull and a purebred Black Angus, spent the afternoon getting acquainted with our red bull, a Speckle Park and Red Angus cross who does not have a name yet. The red bull did not really stand a chance because Adam is much bigger and stronger, but he did put up a good fight. The next morning, when I checked on the herd, the red bull was off in the distance, clearly exhausted, while Adam looked relaxed, grooming one of his ladies. Now that the bulls understand their hierarchy, the herd is peaceful. Adam occasionally nudges the red bull away from hay, but beyond that there is little drama. Later this week, the two bulls will be separated from the cows for the winter until it is time for them to rejoin the herd next summer. Preparing the Farm for Winter Everything on the farm and in the business is running smoothly. As we transition from fall to winter, we are busy placing hay, moving animals to their winter pastures, and ensuring all watering systems are in good working order. We are setting ourselves up for a hopefully relaxing winter, a chance to slow down and recharge for a strong 2026. We're Grateful for Your Support! Orders continue to increase steadily, and we are extremely grateful. Thank you to everyone who supports us and shares our farm with friends and family. Your support allows us to focus on running the farm and the business without worrying about advertising or extra costs. This helps us keep prices lower for you. It is a win-win, and we hope you think so too.

Our Commitment to Nose-to-Tail Eating at Wild Meadows Farm

At Wild Meadows Farm, we always look for ways to make the most of every animal we raise. Our newest product, beef stock, is a perfect example. We make it with meaty soup and shank bones from our cattle. Over the years, our bone broths have grown in popularity, and we hope this new product finds a place in your kitchen too. Products like this matter because they let us use parts of the animal that people often overlook. Since we started our farm and business, we have aimed to use as much of each animal as possible for both ethical and practical reasons. Respecting the Animals We Raise We believe it’s important to respect the animals we raise by using all the nourishment they offer. A cow is more than just tender high-end steaks. A chicken is more than a boneless, skinless breast. The less popular or tougher cuts, such as shank bones, braising ribs, or chicken carcasses, often provide more nutrition than the parts many of us usually eat. These cuts take more effort and know-how to cook, but they can be equally delicious and sometimes more nutritious. Making the Most of Every Cut From a business perspective, we must find ways to use these lesser-known cuts. Unlike many butcher shops or grocery stores that buy only the parts they want, we purchase whole animals from our farm and other farms. This approach requires us to sell or use every other part, including bones, fat, suet, tendons, organs, and more. In the early days, we received all the extras and didn’t know what to do with them. After trial and error, we discovered the concept of nose-to-tail eating. We realized that people value these cuts, and we used social media and newsletters to educate and connect with customers interested in them. Our Nose-to-Tail Success Listening to our customers led to exciting innovations: Nose-to-Tail Ground Beef – 80% beef mixed with 20% organs, including heart, liver, tongue, and kidney. This product is now our second most popular.Tallow and Suet – another way to use parts that might otherwise go to waste. Today, we fully utilize all of our beef, chicken, lamb, bison, elk, and turkey. Nothing goes to waste. We sell all fat, bones, organs, tendons, and other parts to retail customers, broth companies, pet food companies, or restaurants. Our next challenge is the pig. We aim to use trotters, tails, organs, and bones. Some customers buy these items regularly, but we continue to look for new ways to reach people who value these parts. Why Nose-to-Tail Matters for Us Using all parts of the animal keeps our business sustainable and profitable. It also helps us keep prices lower for the more tender, popular cuts because revenue from the less-used parts balances our costs. Every order excites us, but we get especially thrilled when someone orders the odd bits. Rib eyes sell themselves, but selling a chicken gizzard, pig tail, or beef spleen takes creativity, and that is exactly the challenge we love.