On Sale This Week: Extra Lean Ground Beef + Pork Side Ribs

Agriculture and Climate Change: A Farmer's Perspective

written by

Mike Dougherty

posted on

June 4, 2023

The discussion around agriculture and climate change has been growing louder in recent years. Farmers have long faced pressure to reduce emissions, but lately, the push has turned into stronger calls for drastic change.

To get a sense of how this issue is being discussed, listen to John Kerry’s speech at The Agriculture Innovation Mission for Climate (AIM for Climate) Summit. It starts around the 21-minute mark and runs for about 22 minutes. You can link to it here.

What’s Happening in Other Countries

In places like the Netherlands, farmers are being offered 120 percent of their farm’s value to sell. It might sound generous, but if they refuse, they will be forced to sell, and they are banned from starting a new farm anywhere in the EU.

Meanwhile, Ireland is being pushed to cull thousands of cows to meet climate targets. These policies raise questions about who is really driving change and whether they understand the long-term consequences for farmers, food systems, and communities. You can learn more about this matter here

The Numbers Behind Agricultural Emissions

Kerry states that agriculture produces about 33 percent of global emissions. However, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), agriculture generates closer to 10 to 12 percent of greenhouse gases. Packaging, transportation, and waste management make up the rest.

"We can’t get to net-zero; we don’t get this job done unless agriculture is front and centre as part of the solution... I refuse to call it climate change anymore. It’s not change. It’s a crisis." – John Kerry

Kerry speaks passionately about the human impact of a changing climate. It is moving, but I can’t help wondering if the same concern applies to the military, one of the world’s largest sources of emissions.

Why Technology Alone Will Not Save Farming

I am not against technology or innovation in agriculture. Progress can be good if it is used wisely. Technology can help us produce food more efficiently and with less harm, but it cannot replace good stewardship.

When I talk about progress, I am not just thinking about reducing carbon. I am thinking about soil health, fewer chemicals, and food that nourishes people, not just fills bellies.

Without a balanced approach that values more than just emissions and yield, our food system could go the way of many other industries, dominated by regulations, large corporations, and fewer opportunities for small farmers and consumers alike.

The Problem With Tech-Based “Solutions”

Most proposed solutions in the food innovation sector focus on technology. These require massive investments, which means fewer independent farmers and more control for those with deep pockets.

And one of the biggest flaws in this argument is how cows have become the target. Because cows produce methane, the answer seems to be reducing their numbers. But that is an oversimplification.

The methane produced by cows is part of a natural cycle that has been in balance for thousands of years. Ruminants play a vital role in ecosystems and soil health. If you want to learn more, the film Sacred Cow offers excellent insight into how grazing animals can actually help store carbon in the soil.

Why Real Food Cannot Be Manufactured

While lab-grown and plant-based meats can be scaled up, real beef does not work that way. Even feedlot cattle begin life on small farms, born in fields, nursing on their mothers, and grazing on grass before ever seeing a feedlot.

That natural beginning cannot be replicated in a lab. Some parts of nature are not meant to be mechanized, and that is a good thing.

Regenerative Farming: A Real Climate Solution

If the goal is to remove carbon from the atmosphere and create a sustainable food system, the best path forward is through regenerative agriculture.

By working with regenerative farmers, agroforestry experts, and ecologists, we can:

  • Sequester carbon in soil and trees
  • Produce nutrient-dense food
  • Create meaningful jobs in rural communities
  • Restore ecosystems and biodiversity

This approach improves the environment, strengthens local economies, and produces healthier food for everyone. It is a real solution that builds resilience instead of trying to control nature with more technology and regulation.

The Real Solution Is Closer to Home

Unfortunately, the people shaping policy often look for answers in the same place they found the problem: more technology, more control, and less room for honest discussion.

The real solution is not found in boardrooms or government programs. It is found in our backyards, our neighbourhoods, and our communities. When people choose local food, support small farms, and value stewardship, that is where real change begins.

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive... Those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."
– C.S. Lewis

Wild Meadows Farm

Regenerative Farm in Ontario

Grey County

Durham, Ontario

Blog: On The Farm

More from the blog

The Food Pyramid

This past week, new US health guidelines were released, where real food was the focus. While we are obviously in Canada and it isn't necessarily directly relevant to our food policy, I think it's telling to compare what is now being recommend in the US (you can find it here) and what is recommended in Canada (you can find it here). There are a lot of similarities, but a few things jumped out at me when reviewing the two policies, specifically the kinds of protein and fat types to target (and which ones to avoid). In the Canadian healthy eating guidelines it states: "Eat plenty of vegetatbles and fruits, whole grain foods and protein foods.  Choose protein foods that come from plants more often" It also promotes eating healthy fats such as vegetable oils and soft margarine and to avoid fatty meats and high-fat dairy. Compare that to the new US health guidelines, which states: "Every meal must prioritize high quality, nutrient dense protein from both animal and plant sources, paired with healthy fats from whole foods such as eggs, seafood, meats, full-fat dairy, nuts, seeds, olives and avocados." I am not a health expert or dietician, far from it, but I think most of us can see something is off. What we've been told isn't working. It would be wishful thinking to say it is only our diet, but it would be foolish to suggest that diet isn't at least part of the problem. The chart below (here's the paper it is from) sheds some light on the trend of the consumption of animal fats vs. plant based fats. It's safe to say our collective health has declined as the animal fat consumption has decreased and the plant based fat has increased. Food and nutrition can be very confusing in this day and age as changes away from our natural way of being are pushed in favour of new ideas and ways of doing things that aren't necessarily better for us as individuals. I find it refreshing and encouraging that a government so closely tied to ours is encouraging a step back to a more traditional way of eating. Have a great day!

Why Changes Proposed By The CFIA Matter To You, The Consumer

Today I'll write about new cattle traceability rules that are proposed by the CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), how they may affect small farms and why it matters to you as consumers. It's a nuanced topic and there is more to it than I can effectively write here, but I'll try to give you an outline of what is happening.

From Pasture to Price Tag: Understanding the Rising Cost of Meat

I consider myself very fortunate that I rarely go to the grocery store (we have one in our backyard, and for the things we don’t have here, Rebecca is usually the one who goes). When I do find myself there, though, I usually linger in the meat aisle to take a look at the prices. For the record, when we set prices for our products, we do not consider prices in stores or those of competitors. We determine prices based on our costs, plus a markup that we know will keep our doors open and the business sustainable. I do, however, find observing grocery store prices interesting and telling of what the commodity meat system produces and how it is priced. Just a few years ago, I often thought to myself how amazingly inexpensive meat was at the grocery store. Products like ground beef, chicken, and many pork cuts were so cheap. More recently, prices in stores are definitely up across the board. While our prices are still higher (and justifiably so, due to the quality of life our animals experience and the quality of meat our customers receive), the difference isn’t as great as it used to be. So why have grocery store prices increased so much? 1) Inflation is affecting everyone.Inflation is affecting everyone, including farmers, butchers, transport companies, and even grocery stores. Out-of-control money printing, higher energy costs, higher taxes, and wages that don’t keep up are a recipe for higher food prices—and for the general public to feel the strain financially. 2) Supply and demand are out of whack.Several factors, such as drought in the West, an aging farmer population, and higher beef prices (which discourage farmers from maintaining breeding stock), are leading to a lower cattle “inventory” in North America. That means fewer calves and a lower overall population, reducing supply. No one really knows when beef prices will come down, but the best-case scenario appears to be early 2028, based on what I’ve heard. Traditionally, chicken and other less expensive proteins have helped replace beef as prices rise. While it’s true that more people are choosing chicken as an alternative, beef demand has remained strong despite higher prices. Additionally, increased demand for chicken, combined with population growth and Canada’s restrictive production system (supply management), is projected to raise chicken prices by 25% in 2026. 3) Demand for meat isn’t slowing down.Experts often claim that more people will turn to “alternative” proteins as prices rise, and perhaps this is true for some. But you can’t beat the real thing, and I believe most people understand this. The public outcry over news that cloned meat could enter the supply chain without labelling is a good indicator that people do not want their food tampered with. So while I believe our products exist on a different playing field than their commodity and mass-produced counterparts, it’s interesting to observe how markets are changing and to track how these shifts may impact our customers and our business. Thanks for following along, and I hope you find my insights into our food system useful.